Example 8 - Poster Presentation Rubric
Characteristics to note in the rubric:
- Language is descriptive, not evaluative.
- Labels for degrees of success are descriptive ("Expert" "Proficient", etc.); by avoiding the use of letters representing grades or numbers representing points, there is no implied contract that qualities of the paper will "add up" to a specified score or grade or that all dimensions are of equal grading value.
- Professor provides this to the students when giving the assignment for the poster presentation so students may use this as a gauge for self-evaluation as they are designing their poster presentations.
- This rubric is developed for a specific poster presentation assignment; it would need to be revised to describe the expectations for each specific assignment.
Download Poster Presentation Rubric PDF.
RUBRIC for POSTER PRESENTATIONS |
||||
Criteria |
Expert |
Proficient
|
Apprentice
|
Novice
|
Presentation of Research |
Prominently positions title/authors of paper thoroughly but concisely presents main points of introduction, hypotheses/ propositions, research methods, results, and conclusions in a well-organized manner Narration and/or answering of questions is engaging, thorough, and adds greatly to the presentation |
Contains title/authors of paper adequately presents main points of introduction, hypotheses/ proposition, research methods, results, and conclusions in a fairly well-organized manner Narration and/or answering of questions is adequate and adds to the presentation |
Contains title/authors of paper presents main points of introduction, hypotheses/ propositions, research methods, results, and conclusions but not as sufficiently and not as well-organized Narration and/or answering of questions is somewhat lacking |
Title/authors absent Does not sufficiently present main points of introduction, hypotheses/ propositions, research methods, results, and conclusions and is not well-organized Narration and/or answering of questions is lacking |
Visual Presentation |
Overall visually appealing; not cluttered; colors and patterns enhance readability; Uses font sizes/variations which facilitate the organization, presentation, and readability of the research Graphics (e.g., tables, figures, etc.) are engaging and enhance the text content is clearly arranged so that the viewer can understand order without narration |
Overall visually appealing; not cluttered; colors and patterns support readability Adequate use of font sizes/variations to facilitate the organization, presentation, and readability of the research Graphics (e.g. tables, figures, etc.) enhance the text content is arranged so that the viewer can understand order without narration |
Visual appeal is adequate; somewhat cluttered; colors and patterns detract from readability Use of font sizes/variations to facilitate the organization, presentation, and readability of the research is somewhat inconsistent/distractions Graphics (e.g., tables, figures, etc.) adequately enhance the text Content arrangement is somewhat confusing and does not adequately assist the viewer in understanding order without narration |
Not very visually appealing; cluttered; colors and patterns hinder readability Use of font sizes/variations to facilitate the organization, presentation, and readability of the research is inconsistent/distracting Graphics (e.g., tables, figures, etc.) do not enhance the text Content arrangement is somewhat confusing and does not adequately assist the viewer in understanding order without narration |
Documentation of Sources, Quality of Sources |
Cites all data obtained from other sources. APA citation style is accurate |
Cites most data obtained from other sources. APA citation style is accurate |
Cites some data obtained from other sources. Citation style is either inconsistent or incorrect. |
Does not cite sources. |
Spelling & Grammar |
No spelling & grammar mistakes |
Minimal spelling & grammar mistakes |
Noticeable spelling and grammar mistakes |
Excessive spelling and/or grammar mistakes |
Comments: |
Swygart-Hobaugh, A. J.