Purpose:
The purpose of the Appellate Brief and Oral Argument assignment is to
practice the research and advocacy skills which are characteristic of
liberal education and essential for the legal trade, and to do so in a
situation which simulates to some degree the real-world legal environment.
Stages in the Assignment:
CASE ASSIGNMENT:
On the first Wednesday of the term a random device will be used to assign
students to cases. Each case will have two students assigned, one to
the petitioner (appellant in the case of an appeal) and one to the respondent
(appellee in the case of an appeal). The same day you will receive a
schedule of dates on which particular cases will be argued.
THE APPELLATE
BRIEF: After you have your assignment and before your presentation
date you have the following duties:
a. Study your case
with great care. Learn "everything" (see note below) you can about it,
particularly about the constitutional issues on which the case must
be decided. The best single source for this research is the original
synopsis and decision with associated concurring and dissenting opinions
printed in the United States Reports. You should also consult
previous cases relied upon in the decision of your case, the U.S.
Constitution Annotated, and other legal resources as appropriate.
Part of the task is to learn to do some creative searching for information,
but the Legal Resources of Russell
Cole Library will get you started.
(Note: The actual briefs filed with the court and the
transcripts or recordings of oral arguments are off limits. Using them
is prohibited and probably counter-productive. You might be seduced
into copying when you should be thinking with the result that you don't
understand your own argument. Furthermore, the actual briefs often raise
issues--both substantive and procedural--that go beyond the scope of
this class. You risk confusing yourself and the court.)
b. Prepare a written
brief of your argument. This is not a study brief of a decision already
made. Those briefs are designed to help you learn the basic elements
of the cases we read. This is an advocacy brief--a synopsis of the most
critical arguments and precedents which favor your side of this controversy.
Briefs should follow the form set out in the Handbook of Appellate
Advocacy except that you may omit Topical Index, Table of Authorities,
Opinions Below, Jurisdictional Statement and Summary of Argument. The
Handbook of Appellate Advocacy provides detailed guidance for
preparing an effective brief. (Note: It is even more
important for you than it would be for an attorney arguing to real judges
that you explain the pertinence of every precedent
to your case. Never make an assertion supported simply by a case reference.
Describe the pertinent elements of each precedent you
cite and explain why that precedent ought to be determinative
in your case.) Your brief must be distributed to every member of the
class by e-mail attachment by 1:00 p.m. on the day before your oral
argument. Your opponent will also get a copy of your brief at that time.
(Notes: To save paper your briefs may be printed single-spaced.
An exceptionally good Model Appellate
Brief is available for your scrutiny.)
c. Study your opponent's brief and concentrate on how you can most effectively
counter the arguments that he/she intends to make. If you have done
your research well, your opponent's brief will contain no surprises.
FORMAL ORAL PRESENTATION:
On the day of the oral argument attorneys for petitioner (appellant
in the case of an appeal) and respondent (appellee in the case of an
appeal) will be given 10 minutes each to present their cases to the
court (made up of the professor and the rest of the students in the
class). Students whose initial presentation to the court consumes less
than the full 10 minutes allowed may reserve the remainder for rebuttal.
As in the Supreme Court, the time limit will be rigidly enforced. Attorneys
are reminded that preparing the written brief and preparing the oral
argument are different tasks. Although our format differs significantly
from that of a real appellate (or law school moot court) hearing, the
general advice on preparing for and delivering an oral argument
in the Handbook of Appellate Advocacy still applies. You may
want to listen to some experts argue real cases before the Supreme Court.
See Irons: May It Please the Court (1993) [live recordings
of oral arguments before the Supreme Court] on reserve for this course.
QUESTIONS:
Following the formal presentations, attorneys will be questioned by
members of the court. Again, consult the Handbook of Appellate Advocacy
for general advice. Subsequently, attorneys will be dismissed,
and the court will deliberate "in conference." Eventually, the court
will vote a decision, attorneys will be recalled and informed of our
decision, and the real world outcome of the case will be revealed and
discussed.
EVALUATION:
Your brief, formal oral presentation, and response to the court's questions
will be evaluated independently, and your grade for the project will
reflect the quality of its three components. You will receive a written
evaluation of each component.